Ranked-choice voting (RCV) is designed to avoid runoff elections in states and localities that have incorporated runoffs into their electoral system.
RCV uses a process of elimination to select the winner when there are multiple candidates for an office and none gets more than 50 percent of the vote in the first tally.
Voters may rank candidates in order of preference. If no candidate gets more than 50 percent of the votes in the first tally, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated. The ballots of the voters who chose the eliminated candidate are then added to the total of their second-ranked candidate and the ballots are re-tabulated. The process continues until one candidate ultimately gets a majority of the votes and is declared the winner.
Proponents, led by FairVote, argue that ranked-choice voting can save the cost of runoff elections and that third parties are less likely to spoil elections with the process of elimination. A way to save money and short-circuit those pesky political competitors.
RCV is used in certain Australian parliamentary races. However, the system has not been used or tested broadly in jurisdictions across the U.S. No state uses a ranked-choice system to elect candidates, and it has only been used in 11 jurisdictions nationwide, including municipal elections in California, Minnesota and the State of Washington, among others.
RCV was found to be unconstitutional in certain state races by the Maine Supreme Court. As an Illinois state senator, Barack Obama introduced an instant runoff bill for statewide and congressional primaries in 2002.
Opponents of RCV point to its obvious weaknesses:
Ranked-Choice Voting Increases Cost of Elections
Many jurisdictions, including Maine, which are considering the change to instant runoffs, do not have the proper equipment to implement ranked-choice voting and would have to buy new systems and/or software.
Ranked-Choice Voting Is Confusing
A ballot where registrants vote for only one candidate is straightforward. However, voting for the same office multiple times confuses the process. The error rate in RCV cities is higher than in cities with normal balloting.
Ranked-Choice Voting Would Likely Reduce Voter Participation
Voters must extensively research all candidates, even in less prominent races, and then rank them in order of preference with second- and third-choice candidates rather than simply choosing one candidate. Voters faced with such a burden would be more likely not to vote at all.
Ranked-Choice Voting Sounds Better on Paper
As reported in a PBS article, many dispute that RCV guarantees a true majority winner:
A 2014 academic study concluded that an instant runoff system “does not ensure that the winning candidate will have received a majority of all votes cast, only a majority of all valid votes in the final round of tallying.”1 This is because ballots become “exhausted” and are discarded along the way —- when the voter marked only one or two candidates or marked the same candidate twice or candidates were eliminated before the final round. The finding “raises serious concerns about [instant runoffs] and challenges a key argument made by the system’s proponents,” wrote the study’s co-authors, Craig Burnett of the University of North Carolina-Wilmington and Vladimir Kogan of Ohio State.2 One of the four local elections that Burnett and Kogan studied was that of Tony Santos, mayor of San Leandro, in the Bay Area of California, who blames his re-election defeat on a 2010 instant runoff that went six rounds.3
FOOTNOTES
1. [https://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/instant-runoffs-better-way-vote/.]↩
2. [Id.]↩
3. [Id.]↩
ACTIVITY
NAACP head slams ranked choice voting, urges overhaul of board
The head of the NAACP in New York slammed the new ranked-choice voting system as “voter suppression” while calling for an overhaul of the bumbling New York City Board of Elections.
Launch of campaign to repeal ranked choice voting draws a crowd in Anchorage
A few hundred people met at a south Anchorage church Thursday night to kick off a signature drive aiming to get rid of ranked choice voting and go back to the way Alaska used to elect candidates.
City voters repeal Instant Runoff Voting
A large majority of Aspen voters have rejected instant runoff voting for city elections, opting instead to go back to the June runoff system.
Ranked-choice voting in Utah: How did it work?
When Monica Zoltanski was elected mayor of Sandy, Utah, from a crowded field of eight candidates by only 21 votes in November 2021, the city had to hold a recount — not just because of the close vote, but also because of voter confusion. Such were the fruits of Sandy’s experiment with ranked-choice voting.
Jason Snead: The Ranked-Choice Voting Virus Spreads To Utah
"A guinea pig.” That is what Sandy, Utah Mayor Monica Zoltanski said that “ranked-choice voting” (RCV) made of her hometown. The town opted into Utah’s controversial RCV pilot program, but the experiment has not gone well. The cost-saving promised by proponents never materialized, but the real alarm bells should have sounded when the experiment produced voter confusion and voter disengagement.Yet instead of ending this failed pilot program, Utah legislators are now considering a bill to expand ranked-choice voting to primary elections for state and federal office.
Utah Considers Ranked-Choice Voting Despite Disastrous Record
Despite disastrous outcomes in Alaska, Maine, and multiple U.S. municipalities due to ranked-choice voting, Utah is considering legislation to follow their steps.
Ranked-Choice Voting in Maine Delayed until 2021
The state Senate voted to delay it to give supporters time to attempt to change the Maine Constitution.
Ranked Choice Voting Stays Alive in Maine — for Now
The Maine Supreme Court said the voter-approved law is unconstitutional for general elections for governor and state lawmakers.
Maryland to Pennsylvania (and Four Other States): We’ll Redistrict When You Do
The idea is that six states would even each other out — some would go more red, others more blue.